The Beggining of the End for VC Tech Enabled Property Management


There was a moment where our industry was star struck by the outside capital pouring in to fund VC-Backed property management companies.

Now those companies are going under one by one.

Yesterday the most well funded player in the category announced it was acquired by RoofStock.

Mynd raised over $200M at close to a billion dollar valuation.

Their thesis was pure play tech augmented by people:

Mynd’s tech product is complemented by “boots on the ground” people in local markets, improving the speed and clarity of communications that the company can provide to Mynd residents. - Doug Brian, Source.

Here are my speculations:

  1. This is not a merger - After 3 rounds of layoffs it was clear Mynd was already in trouble and unable to raise further funds without wiping out existing shareholders. It was time to get out.
  2. This was not a positive outcome for Mynd's investors and shareholders - This was presumably a stock swap at a valuation that almost certainly wiped out all but the very earliest investors.
  3. This is a smart move for RoofStock - They've acquired the assets of other failed tech enabled PMC's previously. It allows them to bolster their portfolio and acquire some tech for very little cash outlay.

My main takeaway is this.

Property management is a service business.

Tech can improve it - but will not replace it.

Which means tech valuations in property management are a trap.

There is no easy pivot for the tech players left in the space.

Best case scenario is profitability.

And profit means existing shareholders get crushed.

Why?

Because profits shatter the idea of a tech play and clarifies that it's actually a cashflowing service business.

This means existing investors overpaid by 5-10x and any future capital raises will require a significant down round further crushing existing shareholders.

Can this be overcome?

With enough time, yes.

Example: Assume a 10x revenue valuation corrects to a 2x revenue valuation. This 80% haircut would require roughly 7 years of 25% annual revenue growth to get back to the original valuation, i.e. A 7 year hold time to generate a 0% return on the original investment.

Can cashflows and distributions make up for this?

Not really.

Example: Assume a 20% annual distribution to shareholders (wildly generous). If the biz was valued at $100 but was really worth $20 and is actually generating $10 in annual revenues, it would take 50 years to get the original investment back.

In summary - cash is still king.

I'll leave it there for now, for more thoughts see my previous coverage below.

video preview

- JAAM​

P.S. - I've paused the podcast for the moment after a bit of a creative dry spell. I'd love any feedback on 1) whether you'd like to see more episodes and 2) if so what you'd love to hear about.

---

Know someone that would enjoy the newsletter? They can subscribe here.

Jordan Muela

SaaS 🏴‍☠️ | Property Management Fanatic 💙 | I write a bi-weekly newsletter to 4k PMs talking people, process and profit.

Read more from Jordan Muela

This was a wild ride. Imagine growing to over 20,000 doors and then staring liquidation in the face. RW was sold to GA Technologies earlier this year for $8M after going public in 2022 via a SPAC that gave them the ticker symbol SFR. The rise, fall and rebirth of Renters Warehouse is a truly wild ride and I cannot thank Kevin Ortner enough for the courage and candor of breaking it all down. This interview is special for me for a couple reasons: Brenton Hayden, the founder of RW was the first...

Guys... we're back at it again. We're about to release another piece of original research and I could not be more stoked as it generated a TON of actionable insight. Peter Lohmann and I went big, retained a top tier research firm, and have produced a report jam packed with insight about the independent single family property owner and what they want from they property manager partners. We're releasing the data tomorrow at LeadSimple University and you can tune in for free by registering here....

The PAS (Property Accounting Software) market is at an inflection point. A small number of companies control the majority of the market. This control is used to exert leverage. Examples: Restricting customers from accessing their own data via API Charging customers exorbitant fees to access their own data via API Blocking vendors from integrating with their customers Taxing other vendors for the privilege of integrating with them What is the net effect of all of this? Customers have fewer...